theQuestion: Is Trump A Fascist?
While Trump exhibits traits that critics argue have authoritarian, nationalist, or anti-democratic tendencies, calling him a fascist is beyond the pale. Trump’s nationalism, populist rhetoric, and personal leadership style may share certain surface-level similarities with the progressive-left’s concept of fascism, but key elements such as an authoritarian regime, suppression of free media, militaristic expansionism, and total state control of the economy are entirely absent in Trump world.
The use of the term “fascist” by the progressive-left can be seen as either oversimplified, exaggerated or wildly hysterical when measured against the full historical meaning of fascism. Which, by the way, is perfectly at home next to progressives on the political spectrum.
External forces that seek to destroy individual liberty are collectivist in nature. While some believe fascism is a right-wing phenomenon, they would be mistaken to believe that conservatives are fascists. Fascism does indeed fall on the right side of the political spectrum, however the spectrum is collectivist. This collectivist line runs from communism and socialism to progressivism, with fascism merely taking its place to the right of progressivism. All of these ideologies—despite their surface differences—share a common approach: they seek to subordinate the individual to the collective.
The individual’s personal frontier, the space in which identity and autonomy develop, is consistently invaded by these external powers. Whether through the state, an ideology, or social pressure, collectivism pushes the individual toward conformity, often by force or coercion, and in the process creates “government-approved inner selves”. Conservatism occupies no real-estate on this spectrum—though many are convinced it’s just left of fascism. Collectivism, regardless of its particular ideological bent, remains the root of the threat to individuals.
The mechanisms used to propagate fascism—such as propaganda, social control, and suppression of dissent—are tools of the collectivist apparatus. Whether labeled as left or right, these forces all share a fundamental opposition to individualism. It could not be said that Trump wields these mechanisms, when the Democratic party, woke mob, big tech and sycophants in the mainstream media clearly are the masters of these tools of oppression.
By contrast, Donald Trump, while often described as authoritarian or nationalist, has consistently championed policies and rhetoric that emphasize individualism, capitalism, deregulation, and economic freedom—traits that are antithetical to collectivism. His “America First” nationalism, although aggressive and focused on protecting American interests, doesn’t align with collectivist ideology. Instead, it tends to prioritize individual enterprise and market freedom, even if cloaked in protectionist measures.
Accusations of fascism against Trump often focus on his strongman persona, divisive rhetoric, and disregard for traditional democratic norms. However, labeling him as a “fascist” overlooks the fundamental individualistic nature of his platform, which does not seek to subsume personal liberties under collective or state control. His push for deregulation and small government—alongside the promotion of economic freedom—positions him far from the collectivist spectrum.
Thus, while Trump’s critics may point to certain authoritarian tendencies, it’s misleading to categorize him as a fascist. His leadership style may be divisive, but it doesn’t fit into the collectivist mold that defines true fascism. From this perspective, accusations of fascism appear more as political finger-pointing than a substantiated claim based on ideological principles.
About the Author
